Despite the conventional wisdom that managers generally oppose social polic
y, business opinion polls revealed considerable support for the health and
training initiatives of the first Clinton administration. Yet while manager
s acting collectively in groups made tangible, public expressions of suppor
t for the training initiatives proposed by Clinton, they ultimately rejecte
d the president's national health plan. This paper attributes the different
ial responses by business, in part, to variations in the networks organizin
g employers in the two spheres. Differences in policy-level business organi
zation, private policy expertise and policy legacies mattered enormously to
how managers thought about the proposed government initiatives and how the
y participated in the legislative process.