Impacts of mass movement erosion on land productivity: a review

Citation
Pm. Blaschke et al., Impacts of mass movement erosion on land productivity: a review, PROG P GEO, 24(1), 2000, pp. 21-52
Citations number
140
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
ISSN journal
03091333 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
21 - 52
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-1333(200003)24:1<21:IOMMEO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Wherever people gain their livelihood in mountains and steeplands, the prod uctive capacity of the soils they use is likely to be affected by mass move ment erosion. The impacts of mass movement erosion on land productivity are significant but under-rated in the scientific Literature. Impacts on cropp ing are here reported from 15 countries in south and southeast Asia, east A frica, the Caribbean and Melanesia, but accounts are generalized or anecdot al, and do not quantify crop loss or damage attributable to mass movement s eparately from that due to surface or fluvial erosion. Impacts on pastoral grazing have been studied in New Zealand, where production losses of up to 80% at field scale, and up to 20% at farm scale, have been measured. Studie s in the Pacific Northwest coastal forests of North America show plantation forest wood volume declines by 35-50% on eroded sites. Mass movement impac ts on production from tropical forests or agroforestry appear to be as yet undocumented. The reasons for lack of documentation are, first, that most soil erosion-pr oductivity research has been done on gently sloping cropland, which is subj ect to surface rather than mass movement erosion. Secondly, geomorphologica l research in steeplands has dealt with mass movement as a hazard to human life, settlements and infrastructure - with limited identification of its c ontribution to sediment loads in rivers, and disregarding its impact on lan d productivity. We suggest there are many other countries where significant impacts are Lik ely to occur, and that erosion-productivity studies should pay more attenti on to this type of erosion. Studies should not be restricted to cropland, b ut also extend to grazing land plantation forestry, agroforestry and tradit ional uses of natural forest as mass movement appears to affect all these f orms of land-based production, particularly in densely populated steeplands whether tropical or temperate. Topics needing study are the documentation and costing of productivity losses, ways to reduce mass movement impacts on productivity, and ways to enhance recovery of soil on eroded areas (e.g., revegetation with fertility-building shrubs and legumes).