This study relaxes the assumption of perfect and costless policy enforcemen
t found in traditional agricultural policy analysis and introduces enforcem
ent costs and cheating into the economic analysis of output subsidies. Poli
cy design and implementation is modeled in this paper as a sequential game
between the regulator who decides on the level of intervention, an enforcem
ent agency that determines the level of policy enforcement, and the farmer
who makes the production and cheating decisions. Analytical results show th
at farmer compliance is not the natural outcome of self-interest and comple
te deterrence of cheating is not economically efficient. The analysis also
shows that enforcement costs and cheating change the welfare effects of out
put subsidies, the efficiency of the policy instrument in redistributing in
come, the level of government intervention that transfers a given surplus t
o agricultural producers, the socially optimal income redistribution, and t
he social welfare from intervention. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig
hts reserved.