V. Soriano et al., Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy, AIDS, 14(4), 2000, pp. 383-386
Background: Immune reconstitution following the introduction of highly acti
ve antiretroviral therapies (HAART) has lead to a remarkable reduction in t
he incidence of opportunistic infections (OI) in subjects with advanced HIV
disease. Moreover, discontinuation of primary prophylaxis for some OI can
be attempted without risk in patients experiencing a favourable response to
treatment. However, data on the feasibility of discontinuing secondary pro
phylaxis are much more scarce, and restricted mainly to the withdrawal of m
aintenance treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.
Patients and methods: Retrospective review of the clinical outcome at 18 mo
nths in HIV-infected patients in whom discontinuation of secondary prophyla
xis, for different OI, was recommended 3 months after the introduction of H
AART, if both CD4 counts >100 x 10(6) CD4 lymphocytes/l and plasma HIV-RNA
< 500 copies/ml had been achieved.
Results: Fifty-three subjects were analysed. Secondary chemoprophylaxis was
discontinued for the following OI: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (n
= 29), cerebral toxoplasmosis (n = 9), disseminated Mycobacterium avium co
mplex infection (n = 7), CMV retinitis (n = 5), recurrent oroesophageal can
didiasis (n = 5), Visceral leishmaniasis (n = 2), recurrent herpes tester (
n = 2), and chronic mucocutaneous herpes simplex infection (n = 1). In six
individuals, OI prophylaxis was discontinued for two or more entities, Only
two episodes of OI were recorded in these individuals during 18 months of
follow-up. One developed tuberculous lymphadenitis despite having a good re
sponse to treatment, and another suffered a new episode of PCP after volunt
ary treatment interruption for 6 weeks.
Conclusion: Secondary prophylaxis for OI can be attempted without major ris
k in HIV-infected patients experiencing a favourable response to HAART. The
benefit of this intervention should reduce costs, drug side-effects and ph
armacologic interactions, and indirectly will improve patient's quality of
life and adherence to antiretroviral treatment. (C) 2000 Lippincott William
s & Wilkins.