Background: Alcoholics have the fundamental problem of denying dependence o
n alcohol and minimizing their alcohol-related problems. Therapeutic interv
entions often fail to help alcoholics become aware of their drinking proble
m and remain in long-range treatment programs, which is a prerequisite for
recovery from alcohol dependence.
Methods: Inpatients were assigned to either group 1 or 2 depending on which
day of the week they were admitted to the hospital. A newly developed stru
ctured intervention method (Before-Discharge Intervention Method, or BDIM)
was employed with select (nonrandomized) hospitalized alcoholics in group 1
and their family members before the patients were discharged from the hosp
ital. None of the patients in group 2 received the BDIM. With this interven
tion method, the alcoholic's family members delivered to him or her verbal
messages that conveyed concern about the alcoholic's problem drinking, thei
r observations of the alcoholic's past episodes of drinking problems, and w
ishes and support for abstinence. Unless patients died during hospitalizati
on or would not be able to attend the hospital follow-up clinic and local s
elf-help groups (Danshukai) after discharge, outcome evaluations were carri
ed out on all patients in groups 1 and 2 during two calendar months, 3 mont
hs after the last BDIM patient left the hospital. Outcome measures included
patient's and family members' attendance at hospital outpatient follow-up
sessions and self-help group meetings, and patient's abstinence.
Results: Family members' attendance at hospital follow-up sessions and/or s
elf-help group meetings was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2
. Among the three subgroups of discharged patients in either group 1 or 2-t
hat is, those who lived with their spouse, those who lived with someone oth
er than their spouse, and those who lived alone- only those in group 1 who
lived with their spouse did significantly better than their counterparts in
group 2 in three treatment outcome measures. However, patients' maintenanc
e of abstinence was significantly better only when they and their family me
mbers both attended hospital outpatient follow-up sessions and/or self-help
group meetings. We noted no other statistically significant difference bet
ween groups 1 and 2 in any of the other two subgroups of discharged or pati
ents in any of the three treatment outcome variables. Irrespective of the B
DIM, patients who lived alone did significantly more poorly than either tho
se who lived with their spouse or those who lived with someone other than t
heir spouse in terms of attendance at hospital follow-up sessions and local
self-help group meetings and abstinence.
Conclusions: This intervention method can help the alcoholic face the reali
ty of his or her drinking problems and alcohol dependence and thus remain l
onger in long-range rehabilitation programs, which is a prerequisite for su
ccessful recovery from alcohol dependence.