Sn. Piper et al., A comparison of urapidil, clonidine, meperidine and placebo in preventing postanesthetic shivering, ANESTH ANAL, 90(4), 2000, pp. 954-957
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
This placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of ura
pidil compared with clonidine and meperidine in preventing postanesthetic s
hivering, which is common after anesthesia administration and may be very d
istressing. We studied 120 patients undergoing elective abdominal or orthop
edic surgery under standardized general anesthesia. After surgery, patients
were randomly assigned to one of four groups (each group n = 30) using a d
ouble-blinded protocol: Group A received 0.2 mg/kg urapidil; Group B, 3 mu
g/kg clonidine; Group C, 0.4 mg/kg meperidine; and Group D, saline 0.9% as
placebo. Postanesthetic shivering was scored by using a five-point scale. C
lonidine and meperidine significantly reduced the incidence and the severit
y of shivering in comparison with placebo, whereas there were no significan
t differences between the urapidil and placebo groups. Both clonidine and m
eperidine caused a significantly prolonged emergence time (13.4 +/- 5.8 and
13.3 +/- 5.0 min, respectively) compared with placebo (10.4 +/- 5.3 min) a
nd urapidil (11.4 +/- 2.9 min). We confirmed that both clonidine and meperi
dine are effective in preventing postanesthetic shivering, whereas urapidil
, in our setting and dosage, was not effective. Patients who received cloni
dine or meperidine had a prolonged emergence time. In the dosage used, urap
idil seems to be unable to prevent postanesthetic shivering. Implications:
Shivering (irregular muscle activity) is common after surgery and anesthesi
a. This study compared urapidil (an antihypertensive drug) as a prophylaxis
with two established antishivering drugs (meperidine and clonidine) and pl
acebo. In the dosage used, we were unable to show a significant benefit of
urapidil.