S. Sadhasivam et al., Prophylactic ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting following pediatric strabismus surgery - A dose-response study, ANESTHESIOL, 92(4), 2000, pp. 1035-1042
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: This study evaluated the antiemetic effectiveness, dose-respons
e, and clinical usefulness of prophylactic ondansetron in the prevention of
postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children undergoing strabismus
repair.
Method: The authors observed 180 children, American Society of Anesthesiolo
gists physical status I or II, 2-12 yr of age, who were undergoing strabism
us repair. After induction of anesthesia with halothane and nitrous oxide i
n oxygen or intravenous thiopental, children received either placebo (salin
e) or intravenous ondansetron in doses of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 mu g/kg
(n = 30). The trachea was intubated and ventilation was controlled. Periope
rative analgesic and fluid requirements were standardized. Episodes of naus
ea and vomiting were recorded for the first 24 h postoperatively. Data such
as nonsurrogate (parental satisfaction scores and duration of postanesthes
ia care unit stay) and therapeutic (numbers needed to prevent and harm) out
come measures were collected.
Results: The incidences of PONV in the placebo and 25-, 50-, 75-, 100-, and
150-mu g/kg ondansetron groups were 83, 77, 47, 30, 30, and 27%, respectiv
ely. The incidence was less in the 75- (P = 0.002), 100- (P = 0.002), and 1
50-mu g/kg (P < 0.001) ondansetron groups compared with placebo. Duration o
f stay in the postanesthesia care unit was shorter in the 75-, 100-, and 15
0-mu g/kg ondansetron groups (P < 0.002) compared with the placebo group. P
arental assessment scores for the child's perioperative experience and the
positive number needed to prevent PONV were also better and favorable in th
e 75-, 100-, and 150-mu g/kg ondansetron groups compared with the placebo g
roup. The incidence (P > 0.99) and severity (P = 0.63) of PONV were similar
in the 75- and 150-mu g/kg ondansetron groups. Surrogate, nonsurrogate, an
d therapeutic outcome measures revealed that 75 mu g/kg ondansetron provide
d the same benefits as did 100 and 150 mu g/kg.
Conclusion: The routine prophylactic use of ondansetron at a dose of 75 mu
g/kg is as effective as 150 mu g/kg in preventing PONV and improving the "t
rue" outcome measures after strabismus repair in children.