We suggest a new measure of the proportion of the variation of possibly cen
sored survival times explained by a given proportional hazards model. The p
roposed measure, termed V, shares several favorable properties with an earl
ier V-1 but also improves the handling of censoring. The statistic contrast
s distance measures between individual 1/0 survival processes and fitted su
rvival curves with and without covariate information. These distance measur
es, D-x and D, respectively, are themselves informative as summaries of abs
olute rather than relative predictive accuracy. We recommend graphical comp
arisons of survival curves for prognostic index groups to improve the under
standing of obtained values for V, D-x, and D. Their use and interpretation
is exemplified for a Yorkshire lung cancer study on survival. From this an
d an overview for several well-known clinical data sets, we show that the l
ikely amount of relative or absolute predictive accuracy is often low even
if there are highly significant and relatively strong prognostic factors.