The communications revolution has thrown into question the value of imposin
g public interest obligations on television broadcasters. But the distincti
ve nature of this unusual market-with "winner-take-all" features, with view
ers as a commodity, with pervasive externalities from private choices, and
with market effects on preferences as well as the other way around-justifie
s a continuing role for government regulation in the public interest. At th
e same time, regulation best takes the form, not of anachronistic command-a
nd-control regulation, but of (I) disclosure requirements, (2) economic inc
entives ("pay or play"), and (3) voluntary self-regulation through a privat
ely administered code. Some discussion is devoted to free speech and antitr
ust issues, and to the different possible shapes of liability and property
rules in this context, treating certain programming as a public "good" akin
to pollution as a public bad.