Cerebrospinal fluid lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme analysis for the diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in hematooncologic patients

Citation
Is. Lossos et al., Cerebrospinal fluid lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme analysis for the diagnosis of central nervous system involvement in hematooncologic patients, CANCER, 88(7), 2000, pp. 1599-1604
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1599 - 1604
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(20000401)88:7<1599:CFLDIA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
BACKGROUND, Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is common in hematoonc ologic diseases. The aim of the current study was to determine the diagnost ic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme analysis for the diagnosis of CNS involvement in hematooncologic patients. METHODS. The study was comprised of 63 consecutive hematooncologic patients without previous CNS disease who underwent CSF examination as an integral part of their initial staging procedures (44 patients) or for the evaluatio n of neurologic symptoms (19 patients). Fifteen of these patients had CNS i nvolvement by leukemia or lymphoma. The LDH isoenzyme pattern was establish ed in the CSF of all patients and analyzed by the classification and regres sion trees (CART) method to construct a decision tree for the prediction of CNS involvement. An additional group of 30 consecutive patients comprised a validation set that was used for cross-validation of the CART-derived dec ision tree. RESULTS. A decision tree, with a single split at LDH5 greater than or equal to 2.8% for the prediction of CNS involvement, was constructed and validat ed by data from a validation set of patients. The decision tree had a sensi tivity of 93% and a negative predictive value of 98%. One patient (1.6%) an d 2 patients (6.6%) were misclassified in the derivation and validation set s, respectively. Overall, in the combined derivation and validation patient population, the decision tree misclassified 3.2% of patients, whereas CSF cytologic examination misclassified 4.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS. Analysis of the LDH isoenzyme pattern in CSF fluid may be help ful in the evaluation of CNS involvement in patients with hematologic malig nancies. The combination of CSF cytology and LDH isoenzyme analysis may imp rove the sensitivity of CSF cytology significantly. (C) 2000 American Cance r Society.