Prevalence and correlates of preventive care among adults with diabetes inKansas

Citation
Hk. Ahluwalia et al., Prevalence and correlates of preventive care among adults with diabetes inKansas, DIABET CARE, 23(4), 2000, pp. 484-489
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
DIABETES CARE
ISSN journal
01495992 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
484 - 489
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-5992(200004)23:4<484:PACOPC>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To assess the prevalence and correlates of recommended preventi ve care among adults with diabetes in Kansas. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A cross-sectional telephone survey was conduc ted among a sample of adults (greater than or equal to 18 pars of age) with self-reported diabetes. Recommended preventive care was defined based an f our criteria: number of health-care provider (HCP) visits per pear (greater than or equal to 4 for insulin users and greater than or equal to 2 For no nusers), number of foot examinations per year (greater than or equal to 4 f or insulin users and greater than or equal to 2 for nonusers), an annual di lated eye examination, and a blood Pressure measurement in the past 6 month s. RESULTS - The mean age of the 640 respondents was 61 years, 58% were women, and 86% were white. In the preceding year, 62% of respondents reported the appropriate number of visits to a HCP, 27% the appropriate number of foot examinations, 65% an annual dilated eye examination, and 89% a blood pressu re measurement in the preceding 6 months. Only 17% (95% CI 14-20) met all f our criteria for recommended care. The adjusted odds of receiving recommend ed care were higher for males than for females (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.5), higher for people whose HCP scheduled follow-up appointments tha n for those who self-initiated follow-up (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.8), and high er for former smokers than for current smokers (OR 3.1: 95% CI 1.6-6.9). CONCLUSIONS - Preventive care for people with diabetes is not being deliver ed in compliance with current guidelines, especially for women and current smokers. Scheduling follow-up visits for patients, targeting certain high-r isk populations, and developing protocols to improve foot care may be effec tive in improving care.