This study investigates inter- and intrajudge reliability of a clinical exa
mination of swallowing in adults. Several investigations have sought correl
ations between clinical indicators of dysphagia and the actual presence of
dysphagia as determined by videofluoroscopy. Whereas some investigations ha
ve reported interjudge reliability for the videofluoroscopic measures emplo
yed, none have reported reliability for clinical measures. Without establis
hed reliability for rating clinical measures, conclusions drawn regarding t
he utility of a measure for detecting aspiration can be called into questio
n. Results of the present study indicate that fewer than 50% of the measure
s clinicians typically employ are rated with sufficient inter- and intrajud
ge reliability. Measures of vocal quality and oral motor function were rate
d more reliably than were history measures or measures taken during trial s
wallows. There is a need to define more clearly the measures employed in cl
inical examinations and to be consistent in reporting reliability for clini
cal measures of swallowing function in future research.