Previous studies have suggested that imidazoline I-2 receptors play a role
in feeding control in rats. The effect of subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of
four novel imidazoline I-2 ligands, 2-naphthalen-2yl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidaz
ole hydrochloride (benazoline), 2-styryl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole oxalate (
tracizoline), o-nitro-tracizoline and o-methyl-tracizoline (metrazoline) on
food intake during the light phase was now evaluated in freely feeding mal
e Wistar rats. Their effect was compared to that of idazoxan, a high-affini
ty ligand at imidazoline I-2 binding sites, but also a potent alpha(2)-adre
noceptor antagonist. Compared to idazoxan, metrazoline exhibits a higher pK
(i) for imidazoline I-2 binding sites in rat liver, while the other compoun
ds have a slightly lower pK(i); on the other hand, the novel compounds have
much lower affinity than idazoxan at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. Idazoxan stim
ulated drinking at a dose as low as 1 mg/kg, and evoked feeding at a higher
dose (30 mg/kg). The selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist 2-methoxy-
idazoxan (RX821002), with negligible affinity at imidazoline I-2 binding si
tes, significantly increased drinking but failed to stimulate feeding at do
ses of 10-50 mg/kg. Metrazoline induced hyperphagia and water drinking at d
oses of 50 mg/kg or higher. Its dipsogenic effect was secondary to the hype
rphagic effect, since it was not observed in rats without access to food. B
enazoline significantly increased feeding only in response to 30 mg/kg, but
its effect was less pronounced than that of metrazoline. Tracizoline and o
-niho-tracizoline were inactive. Following injection into the lateral cereb
roventricle at doses up to 100 mu g/rat, and into the third or fourth brain
ventricle at doses up to 50 mu g/rat, neither idazoxan nor metrazoline ind
uced hyperphagia. The present results support the idea that imidazoline I-2
ligands influence feeding in rats, and suggest that their site of action i
s not in the central nervous system. The finding that idazoxan elicits a mo
re potent hyperphagic effect than metrazoline and benazoline, although its
affinity for imidazoline I-2 binding sites is lower than that of metrazolin
e and similar to that of benazoline, raises the question whether its hyperp
hagic effect might also be due to interaction with other receptors. (C) 200
0 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.