Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, a permanent challenge or a waste of resources? Prediction of outcome using a multi-organ-dysfunctionscore
Hw. Kniemeyer et al., Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, a permanent challenge or a waste of resources? Prediction of outcome using a multi-organ-dysfunctionscore, EUR J VAS E, 19(2), 2000, pp. 190-196
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Objectives: in a retrospective study, attempts have been made to identify i
ndividual organ-dysfunction risk profiles influencing the outcomes after su
rgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Methods: out of 235 patients undergoing graft replacement for abdominal aor
tic aneurysms, 57 (53 men, four women, mean age 72 years [S.D. 8.8]) were t
reated for ruptured aneurysms in a 3-year period. Forty-eight preoperative,
13 intraoperative and 34 postoperative variables were evaluated statistica
lly. A simple multi-organ dysfunction (MOD) score was adopted.
Results: the perioperative mortality was 32%. Three patients died intraoper
atively, four within 48 h and 11 died later. A significant influence for pr
e-existing risk factors was identified only for cardiovascular diseases. Mu
ltiple linear-regression analysis indicated that a haemoglobin <90 g/l, sys
tolic blood pressure <80 mmHg and ECG signs of ischaemia at admission were
highly significant risk factors. The cause of death for patients, who died
more than 48 h postoperatively, was mainly MOD. All patients with a MOD sco
re greater than or equal to 4 died (n = 7). These patients required 27% of
the intensive-care unit (ICU) days of all patients and 72% of the ICU days
of the non-survivors.
Conclusion: patients with ruptured aortic aneurysms from treatment should n
ot be excluded. However, a physiological scoring system after 48 h appears
justifiable in order to decide on the appropriateness of continual ICU supp
ort.