1. Phylogenetic methods that account for the degree of relationship between
species are increasingly commonly used for cross-species comparisons of ec
ological data. In particular 'phylogenetic contrasts' are commonly used to
generate data for analysis that are phylogenetically independent. The effic
acy of this technique for removing phylogenetic correlations is rarely test
ed, however.
2. For a number of reasons, including non-Brownian modes of evolution, phyl
ogenetic contrasts may not always be phylogenetically independent. This lac
k of independence defeats the object of phylogenetic analysis and effective
ly invalidates the results of such analyses. Typically such problems may be
overcome using simple data transformations but it is necessary to identify
the correct transformation for each analysis variable.
3. Examples are presented for which contrasts have failed to control for ph
ylogenetic correlation. This was because the correct transformation of the
data was not identified prior to analysis. It is highlighted that the very
act of transformation of data increases our understanding of the ecological
variables being studied because the choice of transformation depends on ho
w the character in question evolved.