Reliability of intraocular lens power calculation after cataract surgery in patients with relative anterior microphthalmos

Citation
Tu. Bartke et al., Reliability of intraocular lens power calculation after cataract surgery in patients with relative anterior microphthalmos, GR ARCH CL, 238(2), 2000, pp. 138-142
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
0721832X → ACNP
Volume
238
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
138 - 142
Database
ISI
SICI code
0721-832X(200002)238:2<138:ROILPC>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background: Patients with relative anterior microphthalmus (RAM) are charac terized by special anatomical features (corneal diameters <11 mm, anterior chamber depth <2 mm and normal axial length) that sometimes make intraocula r lens (IOL) power calculation difficult. Patients and methods: Seventy-fiv e patients aged 75.6+/-10.3 years with RAM were evaluated for preoperative target refraction and postoperative refraction after cataract surgery. We u sed biometric formulas as modified by Haigis for IOL power calculation. Res ults: The average IOL power implanted was 25.2+/-2.8 dptr (one-piece all-PM MA IOL; range 19-31 dptr). The preoperatively calculated target refraction was -0.71+/-1.43 dptr (range 4.3 to +2.2 dptr). The average postoperative s pherical equivalent was -0.41+/-1.50 dptr (range -5.5 to +6.0 dptr). The me an difference between target and end refraction was -0.30+/-1.54 dptr Fifty -seven percent of cases did not differ by more than 1 dptr from target refr action, 81.3% by not more than 2 dptr, and 94.7% by not more than 3 dptr; o nly 5.3% of cases deviated by more than 3 dptr. There was no correlation of the amount of deviation between target and postoperative refraction with a xial length, corneal diameter and anterior chamber depth. There was, howeve r, a significant correlation between target refraction and amount of deviat ion of spherical equivalent. The largest differences were found with target refractions greater than +2 dptr. Conclusions: In spite of the special ana tomical conditions in patients with RAM the biometric formulas as modified by Haigis produced reliable IOL power calculations. The best accuracy was a chieved when aiming at a target refraction in the range of +/-2 dptr.