Historical analysis of the development of health care facilities in KeralaState, India

Authors
Citation
Vr. Kutty, Historical analysis of the development of health care facilities in KeralaState, India, HEAL POL PL, 15(1), 2000, pp. 103-109
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING
ISSN journal
02681080 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
103 - 109
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1080(200003)15:1<103:HAOTDO>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Kerala's development experience has been distinguished by the primacy of th e social sectors. Traditionally, education and health accounted for the gre atest shares of the state government's expenditure. Health sector spending continued to grow even after 1980 when generally the fiscal deficit in the state budget was growing and government was looking for ways to control exp enditure. But growth in the number of beds and institutions in the public s ector had slowed down by the mid-1980s. From 1986-1996, growth in the priva te sector surpassed that in the public sector by a wide margin. Public sector spending reveals that in recent years, expansion has been lim ited to revenue expenditure rather than capital, and salaries at the cost o f supplies, Many developments outside health, such as growing literacy, inc reasing household incomes and population ageing (leading to increased numbe rs of people with chronic afflictions), probably fuelled the demand for hea lth care already created by the increased access to health facilities. Sinc e the government institutions could not grow in number and quality at a rat e that would have satisfied this demand, health sector development in Keral a after the mid-1980s has been dominated by the private sector. Expansion in private facilities in health has been closely linked to develo pments in the government health sector. Public institutions play by far the dominant role in training personnel. They have also sensitized people to t he need for timely health interventions and thus helped to create demand. A t this point in time, the government must take the lead in quality maintena nce and setting of standards. Current legislation, which has brought govern ment health institutions under local govern ment control, can perhaps facil itate this change by helping to improve standards in public institutions.