The improvement of the quality of life of people with a severe mental illne
ss is a key policy objective and an important outcome for clinical services
. Drawing on cases assessed using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile an
d its German translation (The Berliner Lebensqualitatprofil), this paper ex
plores the relationship between personal characteristics, objective well be
ing, subjective well being and overall well being. These variables are comp
ared in two large data sets of people with severe mental illness, one from
the UK (n = 1279) and the other from Germany (n = 386).
The comparison shows that UK cases have significantly lower subjective well
being in almost all life domains (except safety, living situation and emplo
yment). UK cases reported slightly but not significantly higher levels of s
atisfaction with employment but German cases are more often employed than t
heir UI( counterparts. The German samples reported substantially better sub
jective well-being ratings for health, finances, family, leisure and social
life. Exploration of the predictors of overall well-being shows that in bo
th countries depression has the effect of reducing subjective well-being sc
ores, except in relation to work (both samples), religion (UK), finance and
safety (Germany). Regression analysis confirms that age, depression and ob
jective circumstances make a small contribution to overall well-being but t
hat subjective ratings in individual life domains make the major contributi
on. The most important individual predictors of overall well-being for the
two samples combined include being a victim of crime, depression and satisf
action with leisure, work, health and mental health, family, living situati
on, finance and social contacts. Factor analysis indicates that the varianc
e in global well-being explained in both samples combined is 36% (31% in th
e German samples and 38% in the UK sample).