This article argues that urban spatial expansion results mainly from three
powerful forces: a growing population, rising incomes, and falling commutin
g costs. Urban growth occurring purely in response to these fundamental for
ces cannot be faulted as socially undesirable, but three market failures ma
y distort their operation upsetting the allocation of land between agricult
ural and urban uses and justifying criticism of urban sprawl These are the
failure to account for the benefits of open space, excessive commuting beca
use of a failure to account for the social costs of congestion and failure
to make new development pay for fire infrastructure costs it generates. Pre
cise remedies for these market failures are two types of development taxes
and congestion tolls levied on commuters. Each of these remedies leads to a
reduction in the spatial size of the city.