High vancomycin dosage regimens required by intensive care unit patients cotreated with drugs to improve haemodynamics following cardiac surgical procedures
F. Pea et al., High vancomycin dosage regimens required by intensive care unit patients cotreated with drugs to improve haemodynamics following cardiac surgical procedures, J ANTIMICRO, 45(3), 2000, pp. 329-335
The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the importance of a B
ayesian pharmacokinetic approach for predicting vancomycin concentrations t
o individualize its dosing regimen in 18 critically ill patients admitted t
o intensive care units following cardiothoracic surgery. The possible influ
ence of some coadministered drugs with important haemodynamic effects (dopa
mine, dobutamine, frusemide) on vancomycin pharmacokinetics was assessed. V
ancomycin serum concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization i
mmunoassay. Vancomycin dosage regimens predicted by the Bayesian method (D-
a) were compared retrospectively with Moellering's nomogram-based dosages (
D-M) to assess possible major differences in vancomycin dosing. D-a values
were similar to D-M in 10 patients (D-a approximate to D-M group) (20.52 +/
- 8.40 mg/kg/day versus 18.81 +/- 7.24 mg/kg; P = 0.15), whereas much highe
r dosages were required in the other eight patients (D-a much greater than
D-M group) (26.78+/- 3.01 mg/kg/day versus 18.95 +/- 3.41 mg/kg/day; P < 0.
0001) despite no major difference in attained vancomycin steady-state troug
h concentration (C-min (ss)) (9.22 +/- 1.33 mg/L versus 8.99 +/- 1.26 mg/L;
= 0.75) or estimated creatinine clearance (1.23 +/- 0.49 mL/min/kg versus
1.21 +/- 0.24 mL/min/kg; P = 0.95) being found between the two groups. The
ratio between D-a and D-M was significantly higher in the D-a much greater
than D-M group than in the D-a approximate to D-M group (1.44 +/- 0.18 vers
us 1.10 +/- 0.21; P < 0.01). In four D-a much greater than D-M patients the
withdrawal of cotreatment with haemodynamically active drugs was followed
by a sudden substantial increase in the vancomycin C-min ss (13.30 +/- 1.13
mg/L versus 8.79 +/- 0.87 mg/L; P < 0.01), despite no major change in body
weight or estimated creatinine clearance being observed. We postulate that
these drugs with important haemodynamic effects may enhance vancomycin clea
rance by inducing an improvement in cardiac output and/or renal blood flow,
and/or by interacting with the renal anion transport system, and thus by c
ausing an increased glomerular filtration rate end renal tubular secretion.
Given the wide simultaneous use of vancomycin and dopamine and/or dobutami
ne and/or frusemide in patients admitted to intensive care units, clinician
s must be aware of possible subtherapeutic serum vancomycin concentrations
when these drugs are coadministered. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring
(TDM) for the pharmacokinetic optimization of vancomycin therapy is strong
ly recommended in these situations.