W. Horwitz et R. Wood, Relationship of (known) control values to (unknown) test values in proficiency studies of pesticide residues, J AOAC INT, 83(2), 2000, pp. 399-406
Proficiency studies have been suggested as an alternative source of informa
tion for evaluating method performance characteristics when results from in
terlaboratory method performance studies conforming to internationally reco
gnized protocols are not available. To explore this possibility, results we
re examined from ongoing proficiency studies of pesticide residue analyses
in celery, carrot, and grape purees, and in wine. Statistical performance p
arameters were calculated from 18 data sets analyzed as unknowns by about 6
0 analysts for 12 analytes in the 25-1000 mu g/kg range, and from presumabl
y parallel control (spike) analyses conducted by about half of the particip
ants. A surprising finding was that recovery of known, independent control
additions by the participant did not correlate with the recoveries determin
ed as unknowns in the exercise. The data suggest that censoring or truncati
ng of control data has occurred. The question of substitution of proficienc
y data for method performance data cannot be answered until the problem of
unbiased reporting of control data is resolved.