The purpose of this study was to compare passive to active testing on the k
inematics of the elbow and forearm using a load-controlled testing apparatu
s that simulates muscle loading. Ten fresh-frozen upper extremities were te
sted. Active control was achieved by employing computer-controlled pneumati
c actuators attached to the tendons of the brachialis, biceps, triceps, bra
chioradialis and pronator teres. Motion of the radius and ulna relative to
the humerus was measured with an electromagnetic tracking system. Active el
bow flexion produced more repeatable motion of the radius and ulna than whe
n tested passively (p < 0.05). The decrease in variability, as determined f
rom the standard deviation of five successive trials in each specimen, was
76.5 and 58.0% for the varus-valgus and internal-external motions respectiv
ely (of the ulna relative to the humerus), The variability in flexion durin
g simulated active forearm supination was 30.6% less than during passive te
sting. Thus under passive control, in the absence of stability provided by
muscular loading across the joint, these uncontrolled motions produce incre
ased variability amongst trials. The smooth and repeatable motions resultin
g from active control, that probably model more closely the physiologic sta
te, appear to be beneficial in the evaluation of unconstrained kinematics o
f the intact elbow and forearm. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights r
eserved.