Comparison of PanBio Dengue Duo Igm and IgG Capture ELISA and Venture Technologies Dengue IgM and IgG Dot Blot

Citation
Aj. Cuzzubbo et al., Comparison of PanBio Dengue Duo Igm and IgG Capture ELISA and Venture Technologies Dengue IgM and IgG Dot Blot, J CLIN VIRO, 16(2), 2000, pp. 135-144
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
ISSN journal
13866532 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
135 - 144
Database
ISI
SICI code
1386-6532(200004)16:2<135:COPDDI>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background: A number of commercial ELISA for dengue diagnosis have recently become available, though direct comparison between these assays have not b een published. Objectives: The Venture Technologies Dengue IgM and IgG Dot Blot assays and the PanBio Dengue Duo IgM and IgG Capture ELISA were compar ed. Study! Design: Paired sera from patients with dengue (n = 20) and Japan ese encephalitis (JE, n = 10), and single sera from patients with typhoid ( n = 10), leptospirosis (n = 10) and scrub typhus (n = 10) were assayed acco rding to the manufacturer's instructions. Results: The Dot Blot IgM ELISA s howed higher sensitivity than the PanBio IgM ELISA (100 vs. 95%), while the PanBio IgM ELISA showed higher specificity in JE (100 vs. 20%) and non-fla vivirus infections (100 vs. 97%). Defining elevation of either IgM or IgG a s a positive result, the Dot Blot and ELISA tests both showed 100% sensitiv ity in dengue infection, while the PanBio test showed superior specificity in JE (70 vs. 0%) and non-flavivirus infections (100 vs. 67%). Conclusions: Both assays are useful aids to the serological diagnosis of dengue infecti on. The clinical setting, user preference and local conditions will be impo rtant in determining which test is more appropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scie nce B.V. All rights reserved.