This study meta-analytically tested hypotheses concerning factors that affe
ct sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts. These hypotheses, d
erived from the social psychological literature on stereotyping, predicted
that salience of applicant sex, job sex-type, sex of rater, and amount of j
ob-relevant information would affect discrimination against female and male
applicants. Generally, the hypotheses concerning job sex-type and job-rele
vant information were supported. Female and male applicants received lower
ratings when being considered for an opposite-sex-type job, and the differe
nce between ratings of males and females decreased as more job-relevant inf
ormation was provided. However, ratings of males and females did not differ
as hypothesized in regard to salience of sex and rater sex. The research a
nd practice implications of these results are discussed. (C) 2000 Academic
Press.