Weapon size has been shown to be a better predictor of competitive success
than body size (carapace width) in fights between shore crabs, Carcinus mae
nas. However, when the weapon size disparity is small between two opponents
, it is still difficult to predict the victor. The role of weapon strength
in pairwise fights between male shore crabs was investigated, to determine
if relative force influences contest content, duration and outcome. Weapon
strength was ascertained using a force transducer on live crabs, then fight
s between crabs were staged between size matched males. Winning crabs had m
ajor (crusher) claws and minor (cutter) claws that exerted a significantly
greater force than losing crabs even when claw length was the same. Winners
and losers were matched for carapace width, claw length and dactyl length
but not claw height or claw length minus the dactyl. Winners had greater cl
aw height and claw length to the dactyl in the major claw giving them a hig
her mechanical advantage when closing the claw and thus exerting a greater
force. The forces exerted by the major and minor claws were analysed for an
y relationship between force and morphological measurements. Winning crabs
appear to be fitter in having a better claw structure which exerts a greate
r force and they are more successful in agonistic interactions.