Risk management: how doctors, hospitals and MDOs can limit the costs of malpractice litigation

Citation
Ll. Wilson et M. Fulton, Risk management: how doctors, hospitals and MDOs can limit the costs of malpractice litigation, MED J AUST, 172(2), 2000, pp. 77-80
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
ISSN journal
0025729X → ACNP
Volume
172
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
77 - 80
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-729X(20000117)172:2<77:RMHDHA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The concerns of doctors regarding their risk of malpractice litigation and the costs of indemnity premiums are resulting in calls for legal reforms to limit their liability. We do not believe these returns will be successful either practically or politically. Medical defence organisations often attempt to vindicate the doctor rather than settle the dispute a strategy that might be morally satisfying to doct ors but which is also more expensive than the approach taken by commercial insurers. Risk management - the activities required to minimise financial loss for ho spitals and the doctors who work in them - is disorganised or absent in mos t hospitals. Hospital managers lack incentives for risk management because the costs of litigation do not come out of their budgets. The five mainstays of effective risk management are credentialling of medic al staff, incident monitoring and tracking, complaints monitoring and track ing, infection control, and documentation in the medical record. The implementation of risk management activities in hospitals is the immedi ate responsibility of hospital management, not doctors.