One striking aspect of certain types of animal assemblages, for example fis
h schools or bird flocks, is the level of synchrony and spatial regularity
that group members achieve. Although the evolutionary mechanisms leading to
the formation of animal aggregations appear to be understood reasonably we
ll, the evolution of spatial regularity and the high levels of synchrony th
at typify the groups in which certain animals move ore less clear. Traditio
nal explanations have generally focused on benefits gained during interspec
ific interactions, particularly the improvement of antipredator responses,
or have suggested aero- or hydrodynamic advantages during locomotion. Howev
er, since the latter benefits of structural regularity may be largely rejec
ted on theoretical grounds, and because many examples of spatially regular,
synchronous groupings - such as dusk-flying flocks of some birds - may occ
ur in the absence of predators, se suggest that these behaviours may not be
explained solely in terms of locomotory efficiency or performance in preda
tor-prey interactions. Instead, we suggest that the maintenance of regular
spatial positions and the level of synchrony achieved within certain social
groups may reveal honest information about an individual's neurosensory or
locomotory performance, and that these behaviours may have evolved as ampl
ifiers of individual quality. The evolution of such behaviour therefore nee
d not have occurred as a result of interspecific interactions, but could ha
ve happened in the arena of conspecific evaluation.