Natural D-nucleosides are no longer the sole basis for designing effective
antiviral analogues, Many antivirals with an opposite (L) configuration wer
e reported, with lamivudine being the most notable example. In contrast, ca
rbocyclic nucleoside analogues are significantly more enantioselective, and
enantiomers with a configuration corresponding to D-nucleosides are usuall
y favored. In the series of acyclic nucleoside analogues, the antiviral pot
ency resides in a single enantiomer. Allenic analogues with an axial dissym
metry are R-enantioselective, in contrast to structurally similar methylene
cyclopropanes, where the enantioselectivity strongly depends on the type of
virus. Enantioselectivity of acyclic nucleotide analogues exhibits a more
complex pattern. The overall enantioselectivity of the antiviral effects is
determined by responses of activating (phosphorylating) enzymes, as well a
s target DNA polymerases (reverse transcriptase), toward enantiomers of act
ive analogues. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.