People rarely make the types of moral judgement evoked by Kohlberg's t
est when they make moral decisions in their everyday lives. The antici
pated consequences of real-life moral decisions, to self and to others
, may influence moral choices and the structure of moral reasoning. To
understand real-life moral judgement we must attend to its functions,
which, although they occasionally involve resolving hypothetical mora
l dilemmas like those on Kohlberg's test, more often involve promoting
good social relations, upholding favourable self-concepts and justify
ing self-interested behaviour. We argue that a functional model of mor
al judgement and moral behaviour derived from evolutionary theory may
supply a better account of real-life morality than the Kohlbergian mod
el.