R. Gillette et al., Cost-benefit analysis potential in feeding behavior of a predatory snail by integration of hunger, taste, and pain, P NAS US, 97(7), 2000, pp. 3585-3590
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hunger/satiation state interacts with appetitive and noxious stimuli to det
ermine feeding and avoidance responses. In the predatory marine snail Pleur
obranchaea californica, food chemostimuli induced proboscis extension and b
iting at concentration thresholds that varied directly with satiation state
. However, food stimuli also tended to elicit avoidance behavior (withdrawa
l and avoidance turns) at concentration thresholds that were relatively low
and fixed. When the feeding threshold for active feeding (proboscis extens
ion with biting) was exceeded, ongoing avoidance and locomotion were interr
upted and suppressed. Noxious chemostimuli usually stimulated avoidance, bu
t, in animals with lower feeding thresholds for food stimuli, they often el
icited feeding behavior. Thus, sensory pathways mediating appetitive and no
xious stimuli may have dual access to neural networks of feeding and avoida
nce behavior, but their final effects are regulated by satiation state. The
se observations suggest that a simple cost-benefit computation regulates be
havioral switching in the animal's foraging behavior, where food stimuli ab
ove or below the incentive level for feeding tend to induce feeding or avoi
dance, respectively. This decision mechanism can weigh the animal's need fo
r nutrients against the potential risk from other predators and the cost of
relative energy outlay in an attack on prey. Stimulation of orienting and
attack by tow-revel noxious stimuli in the hungriest animals may reflect ri
sk-taking that can enhance prey capture success. A simple, hedonically stru
ctured neural network model captures this computation.