An approach to political "human nature" which incorporates data from the na
tural sciences ranging from neurophysiology to primatology better captures
the free-flowing character of dominance interactions than the categorical a
nalyses derived from conventional political science. Even the early theoris
t Max Weber appeared to suspect this. There is an intriguing link between d
eception by subdominant individuals and self-deception by dominant ones. An
imals including humans appear to prefer to be dominant rather than subdomin
ant.