Awl. Kwok et al., Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone, SPINE, 25(6), 2000, pp. 19S-24S
Study Design. Insertion torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylind
rical pedicle screws were compared in human cadaveric vertebral bodies.
Objectives. To compare the performance of the conical design with the cylin
drical design, and to determine whether insertional torque correlates with
pull-out strength.
Summary of Background Data. A tapered pedicle screw design may lessen the l
ikelihood of implant Failure. Its effect on thread purchase is not known. P
revious studies of cylindrical designs on the relation between insertion to
rque and pull-out strength have been conducted in bovine and synthetic bone
.
Methods. Seventy-eight pedicles were assigned randomly to one of the follow
ing pedicle screw: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN
), Steffee VSP (Acromed, Cleveland, OH), Diapason (Dimso, Paris, France), A
O Schanz (Synthes, Paoli, PA), or Synthes USS (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Pedicle
screws were inserted with a torque screwdriver. Each screw was extracted a
xially from the pedicle at a rate of 1.0 mm/sec until failure using an MTS
machine (Bionix 858, Minneapolis, MN). Force data were recorded.
Results. The conical design had the highest insertion torque. There were no
significant differences in pull-out between any of the screw types. Correl
ation between insertional torque and pull-out strength was statistically si
gnificant only with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital and Steffee VSP in L4
and AO Schanz in L5,
Conclusions. A conical screw profile increases insertion torque, although i
nsertional torque is not a reliable predictor of pull-out strength in cadav
eric bone. Screw profile (with similar dimensions) has little effect on str
aight axial pull-out strengths in cadaveric bone.