The paper critically examines the explanations of the Asian crisis which em
phasize the role of national policies and institutions that allegedly creat
ed moral hazard by overprotecting the investors-industrial policy, crony ca
pitalism, and government guarantees accorded to banks and industrial firms
that are considered too important to fail. We also discuss the internationa
l dimension of the moral hazard argument in the presence of International M
onetary Fund (IMF) bail-out. The paper finds these explanations theoretical
ly ill-defined and empirically weak, and argues that the prescriptions for
changes in policy and institutions based on them are unlikely to prevent si
milar kinds of crises in the future. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rig
hts reserved.