CIVILIAN COLON TRAUMA - FACTORS THAT PREDICT SUCCESS BY PRIMARY REPAIR

Citation
Rm. Durham et al., CIVILIAN COLON TRAUMA - FACTORS THAT PREDICT SUCCESS BY PRIMARY REPAIR, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 40(6), 1997, pp. 685-692
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
00123706
Volume
40
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
685 - 692
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(1997)40:6<685:CCT-FT>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary repair has become the most common method of treatm ent for civilian injuries of the colon. However, colostomy may still b e required in selected patients. AIMS: This study was undertaken to id entify factors for the performance of colostomy in patients with colon injuries. METHODS: During a 60-month period, all penetrating injuries to the colon treated at Saint Louis University Hospital were evaluate d. All patients underwent an operation within six hours of injury. Rec tal injuries were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred thirty consecutive pa tients with injuries to the colon were identified. Primary repair was performed in 81 patients (62 percent). Fecal diversion was used in 49 patients (38 percent). No deaths occurred related to colon injury. Com plications related to colon injury included wound infections in 22 pat ients (17 percent) and intra-abdominal complications in 16 patients (a bscess, 14; fecal fistula, 1). Wound complications were most closely r elated to whether the skin was closed primarily or left open (22 vs. 8 percent). Intra-abdominal complications occurred in 7 percent of pati ents in whom the colon injury was closed primarily and in 20 percent o f patients in whom a stoma was created (P > 0.05). Patients chosen for colostomy had significantly greater blood loss, more associated injur ies, and higher scores on the Abdominal Trauma Index (ATI) and Colon I njury Scale (CIS) and were more likely to have gross contamination (P < 0.05). Stepwise regression analysis of 13 factors revealed that only gross contamination and ATI predicted the occurrence of intra-abdomin al complications and that CIS most closely predicted either wound or i ntra-abdominal complications. Stratification of patients based on an A TI of greater than or equal to 30 and a CIS of greater than or equal t o 4 revealed no difference in outcome between primary repair and colos tomy in either the low-risk or high-risk groups. However, severity of injury was greater in patients treated with colostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Pr imary repair can be accomplished with low morbidity in the majority of civilians with penetrating injuries to the colon. Colostomy may be re quired in high-risk patients as defined by an ATI of greater than or e qual to 30 in association with a CIS of greater than or equal to 4.