Dj. Gentry et al., The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: Implications for pregnancy, AM J OBST G, 182(3), 2000, pp. 516-520
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether previously descri
bed significant and quantitative cervical shortening caused by loop excisio
n of the transformation zone persists after 3 months of healing.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was designed in which 20 patients were en
rolled. Each underwent transvaginal ultrasonography for determination of ce
rvical length before the loop excision of the transformation zone and great
er than or equal to 3 months after the loop excision of the transformation
zone. Simple regression analysis and the Student paired t test was performe
d to determine whether the length of the cervix had changed significantly b
etween the measurements.
RESULTS: The mean cervical lengths as measured by transvaginal ultrasonogra
phy before and after loop excision of the transformation zone were 3.1 +/-
0.8 cm and 3.1 +/- 0.7 cml respectively. The correlation between ultrasonog
raphic measurements before and after loop excision of the transformation zo
ne was r = 0.88 (P < .0001). A paired t test resulted in a P value of 1.000
0, which indicates that the ultrasonographic measurement after loop excisio
n of the transformation zone was not different from the ultrasonographic me
asurement before loop excision of the transformation zone. The mean differe
nce between measurements was 0.0 +/- 0.4 cm.
CONCLUSION: After adequate healing time after loop excision of the transfor
mation zone, the length of the cervix, as measured by transvaginal ultrason
ography, does not appear to remain shortened.