Implementation of an emergency department triage procedure for the detection and isolation of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis

Citation
Pe. Sokolove et al., Implementation of an emergency department triage procedure for the detection and isolation of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis, ANN EMERG M, 35(4), 2000, pp. 327-336
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01960644 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
327 - 336
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(200004)35:4<327:IOAEDT>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Study objectives: To investigate the ability of an emergency department scr eening protocol to initiate respiratory isolation of patients with pulmonar y tuberculosis at ED triage before chest radiography. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with retrospective medical record review of adult patients who presented for care to an urban, univer sity-affiliated hospital in Los Angeles County over a 4-month period. Ambul atory patients were administered a triage screening protocol that used pati ent-reported tuberculosis risk factors and symptoms in combination with sel ective chest radiography to screen patients at ED triage for active pulmona ry tuberculosis. Results: A total of 10,674 patients were screened; 2,218 were isolated at t riage and underwent chest radiography, and 378 were kept in isolation in th e ED. The respiratory isolation of pulmonary tuberculosis (RIPT) protocol d etected 17 of 27 visits made by patients with unsuspected pulmonary tubercu losis, yielding a sensitivity of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42% to 8 1%). The estimated specificity was 78%. For each patient with tuberculosis who was detected by the RIFT protocol, 624 patients were screened at triage , 130 chest radiographs were taken, and 22 patients were placed in respirat ory isolation in the ED. Patients with undetected pulmonary tuberculosis mo re commonly had nonpulmonary chief complaints (76% versus 20%; odds ratio [ OR] 13, 95% CI 2.1 to 78.3), and only 60% (95% CI 26% to 88%) were ultimate ly isolated in the hospital. Among RIFT screen-positive patients, radiograp hic findings predictive of pulmonary tuberculosis were cavitary lesions (OR 84.3, 95% CI 22.6 to 315), upper robe infiltrates (OR 24.2, 95% CI 9.1 to 64.4), pleural effusions (OR 8.9, 95% CI 2.5 to 31.8), diffuse/interstitial infiltrates (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.8 to 17.9), and non-upper lobe infiltrates ( OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 9.5). Conclusion: The RIFT screening protocol was only moderately sensitive for i solating patients with pulmonary tuberculosis at ED triage. Future studies should evaluate modified and abridged screening protocols, as well as the c ost-effectiveness of triage screening.