The Borts and Stein (1964) theory of regional economic growth and developme
nt has been widely accepted and discussed in regional economic development
literature. Given their assumption that labor demand conditions are invaria
nt between regions and that the labor demand is highly wage elastic, they c
onclude that regional growth is primarily supply driven and differences in
growth among regions arise due to differences in the growth of labor supply
assuming that wage elasticity of labor supply is the same across regions.
Muth (1968, 1971) claims to have verified the Borts and Steins (BS) conclus
ion. We propose a regional labor market based model of economic development
similar to BS with certain modifications in assumptions and show that the
Borts-Stein-Muth (BSM) conclusion is based upon a narrow view of labor dema
nd and supply elasticities. Our theory demonstrates that regional developme
nt is mainly labor demand driven once we adopt a broader view of elasticiti
es. The broader view incorporates the direct effect of wages on labor suppl
y and labor demand as well as the indirect effects of wages through changes
in inmigration and firms' formations in a region.