Cr. Weinert et al., Relationship between persistence of abdominal symptoms and successful outcome after cholecystectomy, ARCH IN MED, 160(7), 2000, pp. 989-995
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Patients frequently have persistent abdominal symptoms after un
dergoing cholecystectomy. The relationship between abdominal symptoms and b
iliary dysfunction is often unclear.
Objectives: To describe the persistence rate of abdominal symptoms in a lar
ge cohort of patients after elective cholecystectomy, to identify predictor
s of symptom persistence and operative success, to understand which symptom
s improve after cholecystectomy, and to describe the important determinants
of an unsuccessful operation.
Methods: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multisite cohort study of 248
1 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy.
Results: The mean +/- SD number of abdominal symptoms per patient decreased
from 3.1 +/- 2.0 to 1.1 +/- 1.3; 27% of patients who identified a symptom
as most bothersome before surgery still had the symptom 6 months after surg
ery. Symptom persistence rates ranged from 5.6% (vomiting) to 40.2% (gas/fl
atulence). A balance score that quantified the abdominal symptom mix betwee
n dyspeptic and biliary symptoms shifted after surgery to the dyspeptic cat
egory. Predictors of persistence of a most bothersome symptom were dyspepti
c symptom category, worse operative risk and self-rated health status, symp
tom duration longer than 6 months, and no previous episodes of acute cholec
ystitis. The major correlate of not achieving a very successful outcome (15
.2% of patients) was the presence of postoperative abdominal pain. Other pr
edictors included worse self-rated health status and physical functioning,
symptom duration longer than 6 months before surgery, and no previous episo
des of acute cholecystitis.
Conclusions: Symptoms categorized as dyspeptic were more likely to persist
than were biliary symptoms, although all symptoms showed a decrease in prev
alence after cholecystectomy. More attention to the rationale for gallbladd
er removal and clarification of patient expectations for symptom relief mig
ht be necessary to improve outcomes after elective cholecystectomy.