Objective: To determine the major infrared thermographic parameters in disc
riminating between patients with and without secondary Raynaud's phenomenon
.
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Setting: Outpatient clinic of a university department of physical medicine
and rehabilitation in Vienna.
Patients: Consecutive sample of 86 patients (72 women, 14 men) referred fro
m the Division of Rheumatology for the clarification of a possible secondar
y Raynaud's phenomenon.
Main Outcome Measures: According to color changes induced by cold exposure,
clinical classification of Raynaud's phenomenon was performed as follows:
no, unlikely, probable, and definite Raynaud's phenomenon. The following th
ermographic parameters were applied to a stepwise logistic regression analy
sis: the absolute temperature of the fingertips before, 10, and 20 minutes
after cold challenge (T-pre, T-10, T-20); the longitudinal temperature diff
erence before, 10, and 20 minutes after cold challenge (LTDpre, LTD10, LTD2
0); the mean area under the rewarming curve of the fingertips; the recovery
index 20 minutes after cold challenge (RI20); and the most rapid phase of
rewarming of the fingertips of both hands (G(max) right, G(max) left). The
sensitivity of thermographic classification into the 4 groups of clinical e
valuation was assessed by discriminant analysis using significant parameter
s from logistic regression analysis.
Results: Only LTDpre reached the level of significance (p <.0001). Using LT
Dpre, 22 of 23 subjects without clinical Raynaud's phenomenon and 20 of 26
patients with definite clinical Raynaud's phenomenon were classified correc
tly. Patients with unlikely or probable Raynaud's phenomenon were classifie
d as no Raynaud's phenomenon or definite Raynaud's phenomenon.
Conclusion: LTDpre is the major thermographic parameter to discriminate bet
ween patients with and without definite Raynaud's phenomenon by clinical hi
story.