A rapid chloroform-fumigation extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in flooded rice soils

Citation
C. Witt et al., A rapid chloroform-fumigation extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in flooded rice soils, BIOL FERT S, 30(5-6), 2000, pp. 510-519
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
ISSN journal
01782762 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
5-6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
510 - 519
Database
ISI
SICI code
0178-2762(200003)30:5-6<510:ARCEMF>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
A chloroform-fumigation extraction method with fumigation at atmospheric pr essure (CFAP, without vacuum) was developed for measuring microbial biomass C (C-BIO) and N (N-BIO) in water-saturated rice soils. The method was test ed in a series of laboratory experiments and compared with the standard chl oroform-fumigation extraction (CFE, with vacuum). For both methods, there w as little interference from living rice roots or changing soil water conten t (0.44-0.55 kg kg(-1) wet soil). A comparison of the two technique(s) show ed a highly significant correlation for both CBIO and N-BIO (P<0.001) sugge sting that the simple and rapid CFAP is a reliable alternative to the CFE. It appeared, however, that a small and relatively constant fraction of well -protected microbial biomass may only be lysed during fumigation under vacu um. Determinations of microbial C and N were highly reproducible for both m ethods, but neither fumigation technique generated N-BIO values which were positively correlated with C-BIO. The range of observed microbial C:N ratio s of 4-15 was unexpectedly wide for anaerobic soil conditions. Evidence tha t this was related to inconsistencies in the release, degradation, and extr actability of N-BIO rather than C-BIO came from the observation that increa sing the fumigation time from 4 h to 48 h significantly increased N-BIO but not C-BIO The release pattern of C-BIO indicated that the standard fumigat ion time of 24 h is applicable to water-saturated rice soils. To correct: f or the incomplete recovery of C-BIO, we suggest applying the k(C) factor of 2.64, commonly used for aerobic soils (Vance ct al. 1987), but caution is required when correcting N-BIO data. Until differences in fumigation effici encies among CFE and CFAP are confirmed for a wider range of rice soils, we suggest applying the same correction factor for both methods.