Carvedilol for prevention of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy - Final results of the European Carvedilol Atherectomy Restenosis (EUROCARE) trial
Pw. Serruys et al., Carvedilol for prevention of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy - Final results of the European Carvedilol Atherectomy Restenosis (EUROCARE) trial, CIRCULATION, 101(13), 2000, pp. 1512-1518
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background-in addition to its known properties as a competitive, nonselecti
ve beta and alpha-1 receptor blocker, carvedilol directly inhibits vascular
myocyte migration and proliferation and exerts antioxidant effects that ar
e considerably greater than those of vitamin E or probucol. This provides t
he basis for an evaluation of carvedilol for the prevention of coronary res
tenosis.
Methods and Results-In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-con
trolled trial, 25 mg of carvedilol was given twice daily, starting 24 hours
before scheduled directional coronary atherectomy and continuing fur 5 mon
ths after a successful procedure. The primary end point was the minimal lum
inal diameter as determined during follow-up angiography 26+/-2 weeks after
the procedure. Of 406 randomized patients, 377 underwent attempted atherec
tomy, and in 324 (88.9%), a less than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis was
achieved without the use of a stent. Evaluable follow-up angiography was a
vailable in 292 eligible patients (90%). No differences in minimal luminal
diameter (1.99+/-0.73 mm versus 2.00+/-0.74 mm), angiographic restenosis ra
te (23.4% versus 23.9%), target lesion revascularization (16.2 versus 14.5)
, or event-free survival (79.2% versus 79.7%) between the placebo and carve
dilol groups were observed at 7 months.
Conclusions-The maximum recommended daily dose of the antioxidant and beta-
blocker carvedilol failed to reduce restenosis after successful atherectomy
. These findings are in contrast to those of the Multivitamins and Probucol
Trial, which raises doubts regarding the validity of the interpretation th
at restenosis reduction by probucol was via antioxidant effects. The relati
onship between antioxidant agents and restenosis remains to be elucidated.