The aim of this study was to determine whether, using an evidence-based app
roach, the results of the papers found in the literature are valid and suff
iciently scientifically rigorous to be used to definitely address the probl
em of cardiac marker sensitivity in detection of acute myocardial infarctio
n. In particular, the diagnostic sensitivities of myoglobin, creatine kinas
e (CK)-MB isoenzyme, determined as mass concentration, OK-MB isoforms, and
of the two cardiac troponins, troponin I and troponin T,were reviewed using
a priori formulated inclusion/exclusion criteria for judging the eligibili
ty of studies to be included in the analysis. A clear final message derived
from this systematic analysis is the unacceptably poor diagnostic sensitiv
ity of all evaluated markers at patient admission, with substantial failure
rate to rule out myocardial infarction at this time. Myoglobin is at prese
nt the most sensitive of the markers studied for excluding early AMI with a
n optimum timing of sampling at patient presentation and approximately 4 h
later. However, this marker cannot be used by itself as a proportion of pat
ients admitted to the hospital with a late infarction could be missed. The
early rate of rise of OK-MB mass and troponin T is similar. Maximum sensiti
vity of these two parameters is achieved by the analysis of a second sample
6 to 12 h after admission. Additional larger studies are needed to address
the question which troponin shows earlier release after myocardial damage,
and to clarify the role of OK-MB isoforms as a possible early marker of my
ocardial infarction.