This paper reports a psychological study of human categorization that looke
d at the procedures used by expert scientists when dealing with puzzling it
ems. Five professional botanists were asked to specify a category from a se
t of positive and negative instances. The target category in the study was
defined by a feature that was unusual, hence situations of uncertainty and
puzzlement were generated. Subjects were asked to think aloud while solving
the tasks, and their verbal reports were analyzed. A number of problem sol
ving strategies were identified, and subsequently integrated in a model of
knowledge-guided inductive categorization. Our model proposes that expert k
nowledge influences the subjects' reasoning in more complex ways than sugge
sted by earlier investigations of scientific reasoning. As in previous stud
ies, domain knowledge influenced our subjects' hypothesis generation and te
sting; but, additionally, it played a central role when subjects revised th
eir hypotheses.