Tumor-specific CD4(+) effector T cells often play a decisive role in immuno
logic tumor rejection, in some cases without evident co-participation of CD
8(+) T cells. During such CD4(+) T-cell-mediated rejection there is often n
o detectable direct contact between T cells and tumor cells. Optimally prep
ared, adoptively transferred CD4(+) T cells can reject established tumors w
ith great efficiency even when targeted tumor cells express no MHC Class II
molecules, implying that recognition of tumor antigen (Ag) occurs via MHC:
Class II-expressing host antigen-presenting cells (APC) within the tumor.
Because consequent rejection also excludes Ag-specific contact between CD4(
+) T cells and MHC Class IIneg tumor cells, the most critical CD4(+) T-cell
-mediated event is likely cytokine release, resulting in an accumulation an
d activation of accessory cells such as tumoricidal macrophages and lymphok
ine-activated killer cells. Although such. an indirect rejection mechanism
may appear antithetical to popular strategies centered on CD8(+) cytotoxic
T cells (CTL), current evidence suggests that even CD8(+) T-cell-mediated r
ecognition/rejection often bypasses direct tumor cell contact and is largel
y cytokine mediated. While CTL are likely to participate prominently in man
y models of tumor rejection, indirect mechanisms of recognition/ rejection
have the theoretical advantage of remaining operative even when individual
tumor cells evade direct contact by down-regulating MHC and/or Ag expressio
n.