Teacher-reported effects of new American school designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context

Authors
Citation
M. Berends, Teacher-reported effects of new American school designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context, EDUC EVAL P, 22(1), 2000, pp. 65-82
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Education
Journal title
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
01623737 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
65 - 82
Database
ISI
SICI code
0162-3737(200021)22:1<65:TEONAS>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Getting teachers within schools to support, substantively engage in, and su stain the implementation of whole-school designs is critical to the success of the design-based assistance Providers, such as New American Schools (NA S). Rs policymakers make decisions about reauthorizing Title I this year an d as they consider alternatives to previous shortcomings of Title I spendin g, it is important to understand the factors related to ip,implementing who le-school restructuring efforts and early indications of their effects. The purposes and approaches of NAS and its design teams are the same as those of "schoolwide" Title I programs and the Comprehensive School Reform Develo pment program. Each intends to improve student and school performance throu gh schools adopting a unified, coherent approach rather than adding fragmen ted programs or investing in personnel dedicated to a small group of studen ts in pull-out programs. It is uncertain whether the designs kale positive effects on teachers' professional lives and more importantly the educationa l experiences of students. This is especially true or schools in the first few years of implementing whole-school reforms. This paper attempts to shed light on these issues with analyses of survey data from teachers and princ ipals in 130 implementing NAS sites in eight jurisdictions. Findings reveal that teacher views of resource adequacy and communication by designs to fu rther implementation are related to reacher support for the design and impl ementation. The paper ends with a discussion of the policy implications of the analyses reported here and of the need to better understand the process of schoolwide change.