M. Berends, Teacher-reported effects of new American school designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context, EDUC EVAL P, 22(1), 2000, pp. 65-82
Getting teachers within schools to support, substantively engage in, and su
stain the implementation of whole-school designs is critical to the success
of the design-based assistance Providers, such as New American Schools (NA
S). Rs policymakers make decisions about reauthorizing Title I this year an
d as they consider alternatives to previous shortcomings of Title I spendin
g, it is important to understand the factors related to ip,implementing who
le-school restructuring efforts and early indications of their effects. The
purposes and approaches of NAS and its design teams are the same as those
of "schoolwide" Title I programs and the Comprehensive School Reform Develo
pment program. Each intends to improve student and school performance throu
gh schools adopting a unified, coherent approach rather than adding fragmen
ted programs or investing in personnel dedicated to a small group of studen
ts in pull-out programs. It is uncertain whether the designs kale positive
effects on teachers' professional lives and more importantly the educationa
l experiences of students. This is especially true or schools in the first
few years of implementing whole-school reforms. This paper attempts to shed
light on these issues with analyses of survey data from teachers and princ
ipals in 130 implementing NAS sites in eight jurisdictions. Findings reveal
that teacher views of resource adequacy and communication by designs to fu
rther implementation are related to reacher support for the design and impl
ementation. The paper ends with a discussion of the policy implications of
the analyses reported here and of the need to better understand the process
of schoolwide change.