This paper examines the relationship between environmental pressure groups
and environmental policy makers. Environmental pressure groups are assumed
to possess valuable private information on environmental issues. Environmen
tal pressure groups are also assumed to pursue their own preferences, which
are only partially correlated with policy makers' preferences. A new aspec
t is that binding contracts with side payments are not allowed, which accur
ately describes the interaction between environmental pressure groups and g
overnments. It is shown that by choosing probabilities of acting on environ
mental pressure groups' signals, a decision maker can force environmental p
ressure groups to reveal superior information even in the absence of bindin
g contracts.