H. Takada et M. Ravnborg, Magnetically evoked motor potentials in demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathy: a comparative study, EUR J NEUR, 7(1), 2000, pp. 63-69
We investigated the value of magnetically evoked motor potentials (MEPs) fo
r the differentiation of demyelinating and axonal polyneuropathies. The stu
dy population comprised 107 patients, with polyneuropathy verified by elect
romyography (EMG) and nerve conduction study (NCS), who had also been exami
ned by means of MEP. MEPs were evoked by magnetic stimulation of the cortex
and the spinal roots and were recorded from three upper limb muscles and t
wo lower limb muscles bilaterally. From the EMG/NCS results 53 patients wer
e characterized as having primary demyelination (demyelinating patients) an
d 54 as having axonal involvement (axonal patients). Demyelinating patients
were classified as acute (acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneu
ropathy: AIDP) or chronic (chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculon
europathy: CIDP) according to the duration of illness. A series of indices
were calculated from MEP results. One demyelinating patient and two axonal
patients had normal MEPs. The MEPs of the demyelinating patients showed sig
nificantly longer peripheral conduction times, larger interside differences
and lower amplitudes than the axonal patients. The central conduction inde
x and the amplitudes upon cortical stimulation were significantly higher in
patients with CIDP than in those with AIDP. Peripheral conduction time pro
longed by more than 85% in at least one of the 10 muscles studied or a peri
pheral conduction index of above 9.4 were pathognomonic for demyelination.
By combining all criteria 75% of the patients could be categorized as CIDP
vs. AIDP in accordance with the EMG/NCS diagnosis. Likewise, 83% were categ
orized correctly as demyelinating versus axonal according to the EMG/NCS da
ta.