Comparison between low and high pressure suction drainage following axillary clearance

Citation
A. Wedderburn et al., Comparison between low and high pressure suction drainage following axillary clearance, EUR J SUR O, 26(2), 2000, pp. 142-144
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
07487983 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
142 - 144
Database
ISI
SICI code
0748-7983(200003)26:2<142:CBLAHP>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Aim: We report the comparison of low (Exudrain) and high pressure (Redivac) drains in 69 patients following mastectomy and axillary clearance. Methods: Volume of drainage was recorded daily for 8 days postoperatively. Results: Comparison of daily drainage revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). There were no comp lications specific to the drains and we found similar numbers of infective complications in both groups. Hospital stay was also similar in the two gro ups (P=0.70). Conclusions: We conclude that the two drainage systems are equally effectiv e in their drainage abilities although use of the low pressure may have an advantage ol er the high pressure system as it obviates the need for bottle changes and therefore requires less time and effort to manage.