Low plant productivity and poor seed retention are the major constraints to
the expansion of mechanised sesame production. Two sesame cultivars (Aussi
e Gold and UCR82-6NS) that differ in plant productivity and seed retention
were compared, and their response to plant growth regulator treatments was
examined. Plant productivity of the two cultivars was related to the seed d
emand for resources. Although plant growth regulator treatments altered the
seed demand for resources, they failed to improve productivity. Plant grow
th regulator treatments also failed to influence capsule anatomy, reduce ca
psule dehiscence, or improve seed retention. There was only weak evidence t
o support a hypothesis that the phenotype of UCR82-6NS plants is a result o
f altered auxin physiology. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reser
ved.