Closed ankle fractures in the diabetic patient

Citation
Jm. Flynn et al., Closed ankle fractures in the diabetic patient, FOOT ANKL I, 21(4), 2000, pp. 311-319
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
10711007 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
311 - 319
Database
ISI
SICI code
1071-1007(200004)21:4<311:CAFITD>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Systemic and local manifestations of diabetes mellitus may complicate the t reatment of ankle fractures in the diabetic population. We studied 98 patie nts (73 non-diabetics and 25 diabetics) who were treated for closed ankle f ractures by either surgical or non-surgical methods. We found that overall, the risk of infection in the diabetic population (32%) was 4 times higher than in the non-diabetic population (8%), The infection rate in the diabeti c group treated surgically more than doubled that in the non-diabetic group . Four out of six diabetic patients treated with cast became infected compa red to no infections in the five non-diabetics treated with a cast, Even th ough the diabetic foot and ankle are well studied, the medical literature i s not conclusive regarding the management of ankle fractures in the diabeti c patient. Diabetic patients treated conservatively had a tendency to becom e infected over those treated surgically, Peripherovascular disease, periph eral neuropathy and swelling and/or echymosis increased the risk of infecti on in the diabetic population. Diabetic patients with poor compliance had a tendency to become infected more than those who were compliant. We concluded that the diabetic patient who is poorly compliant with evidenc e of neuropathic disease, peripherovascular disease and severe swelling and echymosis presents the most difficult group to manage. Although these pati ents are poor surgical candidates, they are also the most difficult to mana ge and also most prone to infection and complications if treated conservati vely. When faced with this difficult scenario a multidisciplinary team appr oach would probably yield the best possible results by early identification and intervention in these patients.